Anaphylaxis Due to Senna (Cassia angustifolia)

No disponible

Exploring a rare case of occupational senna allergy.

BACKGROUND: Cassia angustifolia, or senna, is a plant belonging to the Fabaceae family, widely used as a laxative and as a colouring agent in hair dyes. Senna is rarely reported as an occupational allergic sensitizer in the current literature. AIMS: To describe the case and diagnostic approach of a suspected occupational senna allergy. CASE REPORT: A male phytopharmaceutical warehouse worker reported bronchial, conjunctival and nasal symptoms immediately upon exposure to senna. We were able to document in vitro sensitization, finding IgE-binding proteins in senna, and in vivo sensitization through positive skin tests and conjunctival provocation test. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that senna may cause occupational rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms with an IgE-dependent mechanism and is the first to confirm it through specific conjunctival provocation test.

Are Senna based laxatives safe when used as long term treatment for constipation in children?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Senna is a stimulant laxative commonly used by pediatricians, pediatric gastroenterologists, and pediatric surgeons. Many clinicians avoid Senna for reasons such as tolerance or side effects but this has little scientific justification. We recently found several patients we were caring for developed perineal blistering during the course of Senna treatment. Because of this we chose to review the literature to identify side effects in children taking this medication as well as to analyze our Center's experience with Senna's secondary effects. METHODS: We performed a literature review (MEDLINE, PUBMED) using the keywords of Senna, sen, sennosides and children, and pediatric and functional (idiopathic) constipation. We looked for articles with information regarding perineal blisters related to Senna as well as other secondary effects of Senna laxatives in children when used on a long-term basis. We also reviewed the charts of our patients who had previously taken Senna or are currently taking Senna, looking for adverse reactions. RESULTS: Eight articles in the literature reported perineal blisters after administration of Senna laxatives in 28 patients. Of those occurrences, 18 patients (64%) had accidental administration of Senna and 10 (36%) had Senna prescribed as a long term treatment. All of the blistering episodes were related to high dose, night-time accidents, or intense diarrhea with a long period of stool to skin contact. At our institution, from 2014 to 2017, we prescribed Senna and have recorded data to 640 patients. During the study period, 17 patients (2.2%) developed blisters during their treatment. Patients who developed blisters had higher doses 60mg/day; 60 [12-100] vs. 17.5 [1.7-150] (p<0.001). All of the blistering episodes were related to night-time accidents, with a long period of stool to skin contact. 83 (13%) patients presented minor side effects such as abdominal cramping, vomiting or diarrhea which resolved once the type of laxatives were changed or enemas were started. The doses of Senna was not significantly different in these patients 15mg/day [4.4-150] vs. 17.5mg/day [1.5-150]. There were no other long-term side effects from Senna found in the pediatric literature for long-term treatment besides abdominal cramping or diarrhea during the first weeks of administration. We found no evidence of tolerance to Senna in our review. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of information in the literature regarding side effects of sennosides as a long-term therapy, and to our knowledge, this is the first review of Senna side effects in children. Senna induced dermatitis is rare, but may occur when patients need a higher dose. All of the cases described had a long period of exposure of the skin to stool. Besides the perineal rash with blisters, we could find no other described major side effect with Senna administration in the pediatric population or evidence of the frequently mentioned concern of the development of tolerance to Senna. Pediatric caregivers should advise families of the rare side effect of skin blistering and educate them to change the diaper frequently in children who are not toilet- trained to reduce stool to skin exposure. We can conclude from this review that Senna is a safe treatment option for constipation in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Herbal hepatotoxicity: analysis of cases with initially reported positive re-exposure tests.

BACKGROUND: Positive re-exposure tests are diagnostic hallmarks for hepatotoxicity. OBJECTIVE: To test validity of positive re-exposures in herb induced liver injury. METHODS: We searched Medline database for cases of herb induced liver injury with positive re-exposures and analysed 34 cases for positive re-exposure test criteria of baseline alanine aminotransferase< 5N before re-exposure, and re-exposure alanine aminotransferase ≥ 2× baseline alanine aminotransferase. Re-exposure test was negative, if baseline alanine aminotransferase< 5N combined with re-exposure alanine aminotransferase< 2× baseline alanine aminotransferase, or if baseline alanine aminotransferase≥ 5N regardless of the re-exposure alanine aminotransferase including no available re-exposure alanine aminotransferase result. RESULTS: In 21/34 cases (61.8%), criteria for a positive re-exposure were fulfilled, with negative tests in 6/34 cases (17.6%) or uninterpretable ones in 7/34 cases (20.6%). Confirmed positive re-exposure tests established potential of herb induced liver injury for Aloe, Chaparral, Chinese herbal mixtures, Chinese Jin Bu Huan, Chinese Syo Saiko To, Germander, Greater Celandine, Green tea, Kava, Mistletoe, Polygonum multiflorum, and Senna, with up to 4 case reports per herb. CONCLUSIONS: Among 34 cases of herb-induced liver injury with initially reported positive re-exposure tests, 61.8% of the cases actually fulfilled established test criteria and provided firm diagnoses of herb induced liver injury by various herbs.

Revisión de la literatura sobre la toxicidad del sen / No disponible

El objetivo de este artículo es revisar la información de la literatura científica sobre la toxicidad de la hoja y el fruto de sen. Este análisis establece que: -No existen evidencias suficientes de que el uso crónico de sen tenga como consecuencia una alteración estructural y/o funcional de los nervios entéricos o del músculo liso intestinal. -No existe relación entre la administración a largo plazo de un extracto de sen y aparición de tumor es gastrointestinales o de otra índole en la rata. -El sen no es carcinogénico en ratas incluso después de una administración diaria durante dos años en dosis de hasta 300 mg/kg/día. -La evidencia de que se dispone en la actualidad no demuestra que exista un riesgo de genotoxicidad para los pacientes que consumen laxantes que contienen extractos de sen o senósidos (AU)

The aim of this article is to review the scientific literature about the toxicity of senna leaves and senna pods. This analysis stablish that: - There are not definitive evidences about the effects of the chronic uses of senna on the structural or functional alteration on the enteric nerves or on intestinal smooth muscle. -There is no relation between the long term administration of senna and gastrointestinal or another tumours in rats. - Senna is not carcinogenic on rats even after the daily administration, during two years, at doses of at least 300 mg/kg/day. -Nowadays, the evidences do not confirm the genotoxicity risk on patients consuming laxatives containing senna or sennosides (AU)

Acute liver failure with renal impairment related to the abuse of senna anthraquinone glycosides.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of chronic ingestion of very large amounts of senna fruits as an herbal tea, possibly leading to severe hepatotoxicity. CASE SUMMARY: A 52-year-old woman who had ingested, for >3 years, one liter of an herbal tea each day made from a bag containing 70 g of dry senna fruits, developed acute hepatic failure and renal impairment requiring intensive care therapy. The severity of the hepatic failure was reflected by the increase in prothrombin time (international normalized ratio >7) and the development of encephalopathy. Liver transplantation was discussed, but the patient ultimately recovered with supportive therapy. Renal impairment was consistent with proximal tubular acidosis, also with marked polyuria refractory to vasopressin administration. Suprisingly, large amounts of cadmium were transiently recovered in the urine. DISCUSSION: Cassia acutifolia and angustifolia plants are widely used as laxatives. Their chronic abuse may be associated with serious manifestations, including fluid and electrolyte loss, with chronic diarrhea. Severe hepatotoxicity is unusual, but could be explained by the exposure of the liver to unusual amounts of toxic metabolites of anthraquinone glycosides (sennosides). An objective causality assessment suggests that hepatotoxicity was possibly related to senna laxative abuse. Regarding nephrotoxicity, there are no available human data on sennosides, while experimental models suggest that anthraquinone derivatives may also accumulate in the kidneys. The finding of high urinary concentrations of cadmium would suggest contamination of the herbal tea by metals, but this hypothesis could not be verified. CONCLUSIONS: Ingestion of large doses of senna laxatives may expose people to the risk of hepatotoxicity.